Thursday, April 18, 2013
The Nonhuman Factor: Who’s Who Among the Non-Physical?
The Nonhuman Factor: Who’s Who Among the Non-Physical? | Mysterious Universe: "While altered states of consciousness do seem to reveal “inhabited” realms to people who seek to explore beyond the fringes of consciousness, do these sorts of experiences really betray the existence of strange nonhuman beings that exist apart from the physical world, or are such entities merely the stuff of imagination?"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
How would you distinguish the difference? Commonalities across a range of experiences? Discussions of interactions with entities would have to be devoid of expectation... As in, explorers of the nether regions of the psyche would report their experiences if only they had begun their explorations without any preconceived notions about entities that may be contacted in "hyperspace." And even then, experiences could be interpreted as archetypal. So what 'evidence' brought back from the depths of the psyche would suggest the existence of verifiable entities? Them giving their names?
ReplyDeleteIt is doubtful that entities that exist in such a powerful 'place' have much of a need to interact intimately with lowly humanoids that are pretty much clumsy tourists and carry psychic noise and mundanity into realms such as these. Occasionally names are given. It would be irresponsible for the traveler to report them as some kind of artifact for science to manipulate or interpret as some kind of sensationalist psychedelic pornography. The impact of successful contact with such powerful beings is a gift that transcends the vulgarity of this material plane, and you won't find many of the explorers of such high levels fiddling with nuances like verification between individuals. Many of us have discounted the actual existence of our 'selves' as individuals, forget carrying on as such isolated instances.
There's no possible way an individual will be allowed to successfully engage in such perverted acts as verifying entities encountered in hyperspace. There's no practical reason for it. Hyperspace is a secret kept away from those who would abuse its gifts in such a way.
I meant to explain that: you wouldn't be 'allowed' to remember information that was intended to be used for irrelevant ends like verifying the reality of the experience through some kind of shared confirmation. More commonly, reality itself becomes reassessed as personal in nature through these types of deep voyages, not vice-versa.
ReplyDelete